An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock
()
or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
“For 25 years this fraudster capitalized on a family’s tragedy by using the stolen identity of a deceased child to obtain government benefits including taxpayer funded food assistance. Nearly five decades after her unspeakable loss, the decedent’s mother was forced to relive the tragedy at the defendant’s trial,” said USDA Inspector General John Walk. “Using the identity of the deceased to obtain food assistance is an appalling crime committed far too often. My office is working hand-in-hand with the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud led by Vice President JD Vance to end the fraud on taxpayers and prevent shameless criminals from exploiting the dead to enrich themselves.”
We found that controls existed to ensure Ohio did not use SNAP administrative funds for participant benefits; however, our analytics of FY 2024 participant data identified 17,000 out of 917,000 households had anomalous data, representing $13.3 million in questioned costs.
We determined that the Rural Housing Service did not consistently perform timely servicing of multi-family housing projects we reviewed in the Midwest Region, which is essential to ensure that borrowers provided rental residents with safe and sanitary housing.
We determined that USDA has not fully implemented cybersecurity and governance controls within Artificial Intelligence systems in compliance with federal standards, leaving the agency at risk of data breaches or reputational harm.
We determined that the Forest Service did not fully comply with Federal laws and regulations when executing the pre-award contracting process for the sampled contracts from November 15, 2021, to March 31, 2025, resulting in more than $48.2 million in unsupported costs.
We determined that USDA’s IT security directives are not sufficiently relevant and effective to address recent threats, as they are not consistently updated and some are similar in content or function, resulting in potential risks to USDA’s IT security posture.